BY JIM Heikkila
The Boeing 757 and 767 are equipped with the ability to fly in a fully autonomous, they are the only two aircraft line [the term used is ‘commuter’ ie ‘commuters’, more precisely used to regular and continuous scheduled to go Return consecutive ndt] Boeing capable of fully autonomous flight. Can be programmed to take off, fly to a destination and land, completely without a pilot at the controls.
They are intelligent planes, and have their limits pre-set by the software so that pilot error can not cause passenger injury. Although they are physically capable of high g maneuvers [ie hard acceleration, g = 9.8 m / s ^ 2 is the acceleration of gravity ndt], the software in their flight control systems ensures that no further maneuvers g up through the cockpit controls. They are limited to about 1.5 g, again, a half g. This is so that pilot error does not end up breaking her neck to her grandmother.
No matter what the pilot wants, can not override this feature.
The plane that hit the Pentagon approached or reached its actual physical limits, military personnel have calculated that the Pentagon plane pulled between 5 and 7 g in its final turn.
The same is true for the second plane that hit the WTC.
There is only one way such a thing could happen.
As well as for the complete autonomous flight capability, the 767 and 757 are the ONLY COMMUTER PLANES MADE BY BOEING THAT CAN BE FLOWN VIA REMOTE CONTROL. It ‘a standard feature for all of them, all 757 and 767 can do so. The purpose is that if there is a problem with the pilots, Norad can remotely the planes to a safe destination. Only in this mode of flying these aircraft may exceed their software limits and fly up to their actual physical limits, because if you used this mode of flight is assumed that there is already a disaster.
(Search on Google for “Raytheon Global Hawk system”)
The terrorists drove in fact not fly those planes, is totally and completely impossible for those planes have been driven in such a manner from the cockpit. They are commuter aircraft, not F-16 and their software knows.
An ‘other critical evidence: the voice recorders were found empty.
The black boxes have been recovered had tape that was undamaged, but it was blank. There is only one way this can happen on a 757 or a 767. When the aircraft are operated by remote control, the microphones that are attached to the cockpit voice recorder are re-routed to the people who operate the remote control, so that the recording of what happened in the cockpit are made in a presumably more safe. But because of a glitch in the system on a 757/767, voice recorder continues to run rather than shutting off when the microphone is re-routed. The voice recorders use what is called a continuous loop tape that automatically every half hour passes back over the recording heads and cancellation, so after a half hour of running with the microphones redirected, the tape will be empty. Just like the recovered tapes were. Yet more proof that no pilot flew those planes last half hour.
Eight of the hijackers who were on those planes are complaining that they are still alive. I bet you have never heard of the fact that our foreign minister has flown to Morocco and issuing an official apology to the accused, did you know? No, the terrorists did not fly those planes, stories of plastic knives and box cutters were just too ridiculous to be true. Each of the other accused have been sought out and killed.
Our information is controlled.
Calls with mobile phones aircraft may not have been made. I am a specialist electronic warfare trained by the National Security Agency, and I qualified to say this. My official title: MOS33Q10, Electronic Warfare Intercept Strategic Signal Processing / Storage Systems Specialist [Specialist in electronic warfare, interception, signal processing and strategic data storage systems ndt], is a MOS [Military Occupational Speciality, specializing in military ndt ] highly qualified requires advanced knowledge of many communications methods and circuits to the smallest detail. I am officially qualified to place a strong doubt that normal calls with mobile phones may never have been made from the plane.
That’s ‘impossible that this has occurred, especially in a’ rural area, for a large number of reasons.
[Illustration of passengers of United Flight 93 families who call with the phone (from a site tribute to the victims)]
When you make a call with a mobile phone, the first thing that happens is that your mobile phone is necessary to contact a transmitter. Your phone has a maximum transmission power of five watts, three watts is currently the norm. If a plane is traveling at five hundred mph your phone will not be able, before crossing the range of 5 watts to 1) contact a tower, 2) tell the tower where you are and what your provider, 3) say the tower how you want to communicate and 4) determine that it is in a roaming area. This procedure, called “electronic handshake” [handshake electronic ndt] takes about 45 seconds to complete a phone starting from initial in a roaming area because neither mobile nor the transmitter knows where the cell the phone, and that uses mode when turned on. At 500 mph, before it can be the ‘handshaking along the plane three times the distance to the transmitter’s range from five watts of phone. Although it is sometimes possible to connect during takeoff or landing, in the situation which has been endorsed calls were not possible. The phone calls from the plane are false, no ifs or buts.
I hope I was clear, if you have any questions I will answer if possible. If I do not answer you must try, try the site of Boeing, try the website of the DARPA [“Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency,” Agency for Research Projects Defence Advanced ndt], look where you have not tried before. Some of the information is classified and leaked by some, and they are also deleted from the network. I have all the original documents on my computer to safeguard me from it.
Please do not ignore these things, because, because only Norad has the flight codes for those aircraft, the 11-9 we did it alone. Hitler had the Reichstag, we have the ’11-9. If 11-9 is not shown enough to convince the American public to put aside their rights for security, the people who made the 11-9 certainly has access to nuclear material. L ’11-9 must be shown for what it is before that material is used.