The invasion of immigrants is a specific project that dates back some 100 years ago. Is called Plan Kalergi!
Especially in this time of extreme crisis, burdening the situation with the desperation of immigrants may just be desired!
Who allows this invasion, that will only destabilize our society, as stated in the Priano Kalergi same, can only be a criminal. It is not racism, but common sense. If a State fails needless to ensure a decent life for its citizens, let alone be able to accommodate these desperate. Coincidentally the same UN calls for Europe welcome by 2025 160 million immigrants. We are aware of those one hundred and sixty million people? This is yet another confirmation that there is behind a criminal project that only the mentally disturbed have devised and put into practice. What it does reflect is that almost unanimously, of our government, asking to welcome these people. But where do we welcome them? It ‘clear that the situation with the passing of years deteriorated and thus continuing get worse. Even they say that immigrants are an asset. But if we have not even work for us! I remember that youth unemployment is around 40/50%, and overall is over 15%. Only the killers can make these statements. Not to mention the turnover that these immigrants bring to friends of politicians, as came out of the scandal of “Mafia capital”, that do not make no qualms about speculating on the lives of destitute and despair. Have you ever wondered where they get 1,000 / 2,000 / $ 3,000 / € for the trip?
Mass immigration is a phenomenon whose causes are still cleverly hidden by the system and that the multi-ethnic propaganda strives falsely represented as inevitable. With this article we intend to demonstrate once and for all that it is not a spontaneous phenomenon. What you would like to appear as an inevitable result of the story is actually a plan rehearsed and trained for decades to destroy completely the face of the Old Continent.
Few people know that one of the main architects of the European integration process was also the one who planned the planned genocide of European peoples. It is a dark character whose mass ignores the existence, but that the powerful considered as the founding father of the European Union. His name is Richard Coudenhove Kalergi. He moving behind the scenes, away from the spotlight, he managed to attract in his plots the most important heads of state, who became his supporters and promoters of the project of European unification.
In 1922 he founded in Vienna movement “Pan-Europe” which aims to bring about a New World Order based on a federation of nations led by the United States. The unification of Europe would constitute the first step towards a single world government.
With the rise of fascism in Europe, the plan suffered a setback, and the Pan-European union is forced to dissolve, but after the Second World War Kalergi, thanks to a frantic and tireless activity, as well as the support of Winston Churchill, the Masonic lodge B’nai B’rith and major newspapers such as the New York Times, he manages to push through his plan to the US government.
THE ESSENCE OF GROUND Kalergi
In his book “Praktischer Idealismus” Kalergi declares that the people of the future “United States of Europe” will not be the original peoples of the Old Continent, but a kind of bestial subumanità made by miscegenation. He states in no uncertain terms that you must cross the peoples of Europe with Asian races and color, to create a multiethnic flock without quality and easily controllable by the ruling.
“The man of the future will be of mixed blood. The future Eurasian-Negroid race, very similar to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples, with a variety of personalities.
Here’s how Gerd Honsik describes the essence of the plan Kalergi
Kalergi proclaims the abolition of the right of self-determination and, subsequently, the elimination of nations by means of ethnic separatist movements or immigration allogeneic mass. In order for Europe to be mastered by the elite, it claims to transform people into a homogeneous mixed race whites, blacks and Asians. These mestizos he attributes cruelty, infidelity and other features that, according to him, must be created consciously because they are essential to achieve the superiority of the elite.
Eliminating first democracy, namely the rule of the people, and then the same people through miscegenation, the white race must be replaced by a mestizo race easily controllable. Abolishing the principle of equality of all before the law and avoiding any criticism of minorities with special laws to protect them, it is able to suppress the mass.
Politicians gave of his time listening to Kalergi, the Western powers were based on his own plane and banks, the press and the American intelligence financed its projects. The leaders of European politics know that he is the author of this Europe that goes to Brussels and Maastricht. Kalergi, unknown to the public, in the classes of history and one of the deputies is considered as the father of Maastricht and multiculturalism.
The novelty of his plan is not accepting the genocide as a means to gain power, but which claims to create subhuman, which due to their negative characteristics such as incapacity and instability, ensuring tolerance and acceptance of the “noble race”.
Kalergi FROM OUR TIMES
Although no school book talk of Kalergi, his ideas were the guiding principles of today’s European Union. The belief that the peoples of Europe should be mixed with blacks and Asians to destroy their identity and create a single mestizo race, is the basis of all Community policies geared to the integration and protection of minorities. It is not about humanitarian principles, but guidelines issued with ruthless determination to achieve the greatest genocide in history.
In his honor it was established the European Coudenhove-Kalergi prize every two years rewards the Europeans who have excelled in pursuing his criminal plan. Among them are the likes of Angela Merkel and Herman Van Rompuy.
Incitement to genocide is also the basis of the constant invitations UN to welcome millions of immigrants to compensate for the low birth rate European. According to a report released at the beginning of the new millennium, in January 2000, in the report of “Population Division” (Population Division) of the United Nations in New York, entitled “Replacement Migration: a solution to declining and aging populations , Europe would need by 2025 to 159 million immigrants. One wonders how it would be possible to make accurate estimates so if immigration was not a well-rehearsed plan. It is certain that the low birth rate itself could be easily reversed with appropriate measures to support families. It is equally clear that it is not through the contribution of a different genetic that protects the genetic heritage of Europe, but that doing so if it accelerates the disappearance. The sole purpose of these measures is therefore to denature completely a people, turn it into a collection of individuals without any cohesion ethnic, historical and cultural. In short, the thesis of the Plan Kalergi have been and are still the foundation of the official policies of governments sometimes to the genocide of the peoples of Europe through mass immigration. G. Brock Chisholm, former director of the World Health Organization (WHO), dimosta to have learned well the lesson of Kalergi when he says:
“What in all the places people have to do is practice the limitation of births and mixed marriages (between different races), and this in view of creating a single race in a unique world dependent on a central authority”.
If we look around the floor Kalergi seems to have fully realized. We are facing a real terzomondializzazione Europe. The axiom carrier of the “New Civilization” supported by the missionaries of the Word multicultural, it is joining the intersection ethnic forced. Europeans are shipwrecked in miscegenation, swamped by hordes of African and Asian immigrants. The scourge of mixed marriages produces each year thousands of new individuals of mixed race: the “sons of Kalergi”. Under the dual pressure of misinformation and the humanitarian idiocy operated by means of mass communication it has taught Europeans to deny their origins, to deny their ethnic identity.
Advocates of Globalization strive to convince us to give up our identity is a progressive and humanitarian act, that “racism” is wrong, but only because they want to make us all blind as consumers. It is more necessary than ever in these times react to the lies of the system, to rekindle the spirit of rebellion in Europe. It must be put under the eyes of all the fact that integration is tantamount to genocide. We have no choice, the alternative is suicide ethnic.
With the European Union surrendering its immigration policy to people smugglers, the immigration crisis in Europe keeps reaching staggering new heights. The word has gone out that Fortress Europe is scalable. From Morocco to Turkey, people smuggling has turned into an irresistibly big business.
From small-time thugs to the terror outfit Hamas — for $2500-$3000 per person smuggled — many evidently want to seize a slice of this lucrative business that was created by the EU’s collective inaction.
In Germany, where traffickers are now dropping off illegal immigrants on Autobahns, authorities have reacted — not by trying to intercept or discourage the traffickers, but by putting new road-signs alerting drivers of potential pedestrians on the highway.
Even before this year’s mass immigration began, Germany was struggling to deal with roughly a quarter of a million asylum applicants — without even accounting for the illegal immigrants already in the country. The recent wave of migration would push those figures to record heights.
The trend in Germany merely reflects the overall scale of the European immigrant crisis. In July 2015, an estimated 50,000 refugees entered Greece, a surge of 750 percent. Last monthalone more migrants landed than in the whole of 2014.
In Germany, the head of Lower Saxony’s Municipal Federation, Marco Trips, told local reporters that the “system has already collapsed.” This sentiment is apparently shared by municipalities across Germany. In a historic move, the German federal government has now called in the military to assist in setting up new tent cities and providing basic amenities for ever-rising number of refugees.
The majority of those entering Europe illegally seem not to be fleeing armed conflicts, but seeking a better life in a welfare paradise. Europe’s answer is to throw money at the problem — money Europe does not have. Britain’s Defence Secretary has suggested that the UK’s £12 billion ($19 billion USD) foreign aid budget can “discourage” mass migration.
The European welfare system, funded increasingly by governments’ debt in recent decades, is showing signs of an impending collapse. There is no end in sight for Greece’s debt crisis, despite repeated bailout packages to the tune of €326 billion ($375 billion USD). Slow economic growth, high youth unemployment and an aging population makes the European welfare model increasingly untenable.
If the mainstream media keep reminding everyone how rioting immigrant youths in France or Britain are driven by economic inequality now, imagine the scale of unrest once European welfare states cannot finance “half the planet” anymore and are forced to cut welfare benefits.
EU bureaucrats not only refuse to implement basic border controls but rebuke any EU member state moving to secure its borders. European politicians and the mainstream media are up in arms against Hungary’s move to erect a border fence along its southern border. American public broadcaster PBS ran a report telling its viewers about Hungary’s “new Iron Curtain.” The Associated Press quoted unnamed “critics” who compared the Hungarian fence to “Communist-era barriers like the Berlin Wall.”Europe’s answer to this imminent financial doom is to create still more welfare dependents or, even better, “invite” them by failing to secure the borders.
The EU bureaucrats in Brussels want to force a single asylum policy on all 28 member states, asking that they take in more migrants. According to this common asylum policy proposed by Brussels, asylum seekers entering EU would be divided among EU members.
Hungary, with 60,000 migrant arrivals so far just this year, entering mainly from Serbia, remains the most vocal opponent of the EU’s proposed policy.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has been virtually ostracized by European politicians and media, for not complying with EU’s immigration policy. Contrary to the EU’s position, he has called for a “distinction” between EU member-state citizens moving within Europe and non-EU foreigners. “There are economic immigrants who are just in search of a better life… Unfortunately in Hungary we can’t give jobs to all of these immigrants,” Orbán said, and called the EU’s proposal for member states to take in more refugees “absurd, bordering on insanity.”
Europe, itself reeling under a financial crisis, cannot provide housing, employment and social benefits to the thousands who each day land on European shores and cross over borders. German newspapers are full of countless reports of immigrants disappointed after arriving in Europe, almost always followed by a reporter’s plea for urgent action to address the said grievance. These “disappointments” often turn into violent clashes. Police across Germany have their hands full just to keeping rival migrant gangs from turning on each other or on officials.
No one, however, especially the media, blames migrants for their own actions. The mainstream media in Germany apparently refuse to connect the dots, so as not to “feed into negative stereotypes.” A columnist for Germany’s Tageszeitung even wrote of an elaborate government conspiracy that drives immigrants to turn violent — allegedly just to give them a bad name.
Tageszeitung also ran a story lamenting the “alarming conditions” of refugees landing on Greek islands. The article was accompanied by a photograph of smiling, well-fed, sturdy young men, posing for “selfies” on their smartphones while holding cigarettes in their hands. One of them was thoughtful enough to bring along a selfie-stick for his smartphone, to capture the moment he fled a “war zone” or acute “economic misery.”
This, however, is the real tragedy of the unfolding refugee crisis in Europe: apart from those fleeing combat zones, most migrants swarming European borders and coastlines do not appear to be in any real or dire need. Economic disparity on other continents should not oblige Europeans to open its own floodgates for mass migration.
This crisis seems to be one of Europe’s own making — that seems to be the logical conclusion of Europe’s debt-driven welfare system and the EU’s contempt for national boundaries.
The 21st century will be a trying time for geopolitical boundaries and ‘ethno-nationalist’ sentiment clashes. As a result of borders around the world quickly being redrawn and vast groups of peoples migrating out of violent crashes, migration becomes a controversial centerfold issue in foreign affairs. The clash of civilizations is further squeezed together abruptly by temporal ages of conflicts from terrorism to drugs to rampant corruption and disparity.
The British and French governments have both warned of the Global Migration Crisis. Their point is that a “Global Migration Crisis” requires a “global” response. Right now, they are seeking greater participation from member states in the region to combat illegal immigration into Europe. Asylum seeker applicants alone numbered over 600,000 in 2014. Many of these are denied because they are fraudulent or not applicable for asylum. Such people are unauthorized if they have ventured across foreign soil illegally and then apply. In some areas, they are seeing illegal migration figures rise 200 percent.
In Calais, France, a self-made camp created by illegal migrants after the closer Sangatte refugee camps to riots in 2001-20002 now has an estimated over 3,000 migrants. Many with Britain as their final destination, attempt to stowaway or disrupt the Channel Tunnel trains. British Prime Minister David Cameron once referred to the migrants at Calais as a “swarm.”
British Home Secretary Theresa May and French Minister of Interior Bernard Cazeneuve are seeking ways to discourage migrants from believing that Britain’s streets are “paved with gold.” The U.S. Customs and Borders have done something similar with an awareness program called “Know the Facts.” It is broadcasted on radios of select countries, along with a website and announcements with the intention of informing potential migrants from crossing the border illegally and believing they will not be detained and deported; and also clarifying President Barack Obama’s de facto amnesty as strictly for internal illegal immigrants already in the U.S. – and not future illegal migrants attempting to enter.
Disincentives, lowering asylum cash allowances and disrupting smugglers have become a priority for Britain and France. Europe faces incoming waves of migrants on two major fronts: from African (mainly North African) and Asia (the Middle East). Britain and France are leading a charge to wake Italy, Greece, and other European states up to this imperative and to stop the flood of immigrants into Europe. Germany’s elected government is taking a more ‘open arms’ approach in opposition to rivals.
Migration to Europe: Out of Control
Aside from out-of-control illegal African migration to Europe, in Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel is battling far-right activists challenging lose asylum rules to inciting rallies and crimes against an incoming flow of immigrants from the Middle East. They are expecting fewer than one million refugees from Syria, Iraq and other Middle East states this year. This does not include the often unwelcome Turkish migrant workers to Germany or illegal African newcomers. Merkel visited a political asylum facility in Heidenau, Germany amidst protests, riots and attacks on immigrants there.
In Hungary, after the highest one day wave of illegal migrants from Serbia crossed the border, the government is sending in the army, mounted police, helicopters and dogs to hunt the illegals down. This is in addition to the border guards and the three layers of 174 km razor-wire fence shared on the Hungary-Serbia border. They camp out along the fence, dig holes and illegally sneak in. These migrants are escaping war and poverty. Their destination is actually not Hungary itself but wealthier European states with liberal political asylum laws. They are emigrating out of the Middle East and going through Turkey, Greece and the Balkans.
It is a perilous journey with no guarantees. But anything is worth the risk than the war-torn place they are leaving or the stagnant refugee camps they may have been held in for several years. They are frustrated with the registration process (e.g. Roszke, Hungary) and are causing unrest. The same is happening along the route from the Middle East which is rapidly causing reactions in Europe.
Even Sweden is having to boost up security measures in response for large inflows of refugees and a murder from two residents at an asylum center there. Two homeless residents were shot as they slept in a car near Boden earlier in the month.
Nils Muiznieks, the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights, tweeted in regards to Hungary’s decision to beef-up security using the army that: “…militarization of borders is [the] wrong answer to migration. It is urgent to adopt a European response, which ensures access to asylum and humane reception conditions.”
This is the central debate in the 21st century. Reinforcing the borders with heavier military presence in response to increased illegal migration or easing restrictions and softening rules of illegal entry. What is often ignored, however, is the presence of a weaker, poorer and even troubled regimes on the borders of more successful and resourceful states.
What does this all mean? The free flow of people is a universal civil right in international law; however, only when permissible after the filters of protectionist and sometimes racist national laws.
Middle East and African migration to Europe mostly face region-spreading civil wars, jihadists, genocide, hunger, poverty and political oppression. Mexican and Latin American Migration to the U.S. involve: political oppression, imbedded corruption, drug wars and a highly competitive low-skilled labor market; moreover, they are primarily looking for safety and opportunity.
Immigration: Top Issue for Election 2016
In the U.S., the Republican Party is placing immigration as a top issue. This is a radical shift from President Barack Obama’s protecting millions of illegal immigrants residing in the U.S. from deportation by non-enforcement. Political positions from the right are now aggressively targeting illegal immigrants already inside and future illegal entry into the U.S. is increasing as a political reactionary outlet.
From a sociological perspective, one must consider the real basic causes. First consider the flows of Mexican migrants to be based primarily on population density and condition. Think higher concentration always moves to a lower concentration from physics class.
Mexico is a population dense nation in With a total population of 224 million people but only 762,000 square miles in territory versus the U.S. with 355 million people and 3.8 million square miles. In other words, Mexico has two thirds of the U.S. population and little over one fifth of the land. That means less natural resources, more competition and so forth. All of which lead to migration.
The next feature in natural human migration patterns is based on out-country condition. Mexico is undergoing a massive plight of instability, violence, corruption and dearth of safety and opportunity. Although Mexico’s unemployment rate is low (i.e. officially 4.5 percent) many argue that is based on migration and migrant workers programs. But the conditions are much worse than finding a job: finding a job, being safe and making money are two different things.
The Mexico Factor
During the Mexican Drug Wars, since 2006 alone, over 120,000 people have been killed, more than 30,000 missing and hundreds of thousands of people displaced. Mexican drug cartels also control around 90 percent of cocaine shipping into the U.S., not including other types of drugs. Even when one’s life is not in immediate danger, it is always in constant fear.
The average Mexican income is only around $13,000 while in the U.S. the average American income is around $50,000. This includes vast disparities in income but acts a gauge of basic comparison and incentive.
The next most important category is the destination country itself. America is the most prosperous nation on earth and in human history. And it is close by. It is orders of magnitude safer and then there is the reality of opportunity and the American Dream. Compared to Mexico or any country in the Western Hemisphere, America is a first choice destination state. Opportunities equal more money. More money equals a chance at a better and more comfortable life.
Why not go through the formal process? One reason is limit caps. The immigration demand is estimated to be ten times that of the formal allowance. The number of low-skilled workers is capped at 66,000 for non-agrarian temporary guest workers obtaining an H-2B. There is no cap for H-2A temporary agrarian visas. Arguably, most want to live here and not just have to work and leave; and many of those that enter as guests decide to stay past the legally allotted times. An argument could be made that there is still a demand for low-skilled jobs needed by foreign workers and that if such visas were increased to match the level of supply coming in illegally, there would be few issues; especially, since they would be vetted for criminal backgrounds.
The last factor on the U.S. side of the border since 1942 has been the policy and habit of hosting needed large-scale programs and granting incentives to Mexican immigrants. The Bracero program during World War II to fill the worker shortage but lasting until 1964. After Bracero, there were large liberties taken in the areas of attracting migrant workers to fill the needs of American farmlands and less so industry in order to increase their productivity and maintain low wages. In other words, when Americans at the time were unavailable or were moving up in a booming economy through the 1950s and migrating internally, foreign workers were filling the void and taking increasingly lesser interesting and lower-skilled jobs.
American political parties each appear to be polarized into a camp of hard enforcement measures on criminal immigration penalties or greater acting humane enforcement and amnesty. Mexico plays down its internal threats for political stability and shuns State Department officials and other agencies for revealing damaging figures. Tourism is a big industry, for example, in Mexico. It must appear as if everything is all right. Former President Vicente Fox called the unauthorized migrants to the U.S. “heroes,” because they bring needed monies back to Mexico by sending it to extended families and friends. It is a common sentiment of the Mexican people and their leaders.
On the other side of the border, the Mexican Drug War is a top priority and American politicians are willing to compromise with Mexico that might jeopardize cooperation against cartels and the issue of Mexican stability. It is easier to keep Mexico afloat than to deal with the heart of the on-going U.S. migration crisis. But it may be that times are changing fast for America. Maybe American citizens need to fall back on low-skilled jobs that they out of necessity could or should be doing. Maybe America is not as industrious as it used to be and the low-skilled workers from Mexico are no longer needed.
In any case, Americans should become more educated on the topic and not just ask “how” but “why” Mexican migration is so strong. The reality of human migrant flows acting as a law of human social nature comes face to face with nationalism and also the protections of cultural identity and purity as well.